Teaching Students with Exceptionalities in the Regular Classroom (3) Diverse educational needs of children with disabilities in regular classroom. Identification and placement procedures, academic and behavioral strategies, and curriculum and evaluation modifications. Addressing Differences in Human Learning in Schools (3) Strategies for assessment, curriculum, and instruction of diverse student populations. Extends and applies information from EDUC 6001. This brochure describes the diverse research areas available in the Chemistry Department for undergraduate research. Its purpose is to provide a basis for undergraduates interested in independent study to decide on a particular faculty member as research advisor. Students should examine the entire spectrum of subdisciplines available in the Chemistry Department as described in this brochure before making a final decision. For example, the 2014 report adds liver cancer and colon cancer to the list of cancer types already known to be caused by smoking: lung, oral cavity, esophagus, pharynx (throat), larynx (voice box), stomach, pancreas, bladder, kidney, cervix, and acute myeloid leukemia. In addition strattera generic to lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and other conditions, the health problems linked to secondhand smoke now include stroke. For the first time ever, women are as likely as men to die from lung cancer. The loss of productivity due to smoking-related deaths cost the US more than $150 billion per year. This is not something the federal government can do alone. We need to partner with the business community, local elected officials, schools and universities, the medical community, the faith community, and committed citizens in communities across the country to make the next generation tobacco free. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 100:915-919, 1997. Ochi K, Kinoshita H, Kenmochi M, et al. Zinc deficiency and tinnitus. Auris Nasus Larynx 30(suppl):S25-28, 2003.. Genetic regulation of fibrin structure and function: complex gene-environment interactions may modulate vascular risk. Lim BC, Ariens RA, Carter AM, Weisel JW, Grant PJ. The nuclear BAG-1 isoform, BAG-1L, enhances oestrogen-dependent transcription. Cutress RI, Townsend PA, Sharp A, Maison A, Wood L, Lee R, Brimmell M, Mullee MA, Johnson PW, Royle GT, Bateman AC, Packham G. Use of RNA interference to validate Brk as a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer: Brk promotes breast carcinoma cell proliferation. Lisa Murkowski is the first Alaskan-born senator and only the sixth United States senator to serve the state. The state's senior senator, she is a third-generation Alaskan, born in Ketchikan and raised in towns across the state: Wrangell, Juneau, Fairbanks and Anchorage. Only the 33rd female to serve in the United States Senate since its founding in 1789, Senator Murkowski has assumed leadership roles quickly. Her writing draws on legal history to explore questions of law and inequality and to analyze how courts interact with representative government and popular movements in interpreting the Constitution. She is co-editor of Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking and Directions in Sexual Harassment Law. The changes are the pain medication online without prescription result of a multi-year study by the school's Public Interest and Financial Aid Committee, which sought ways to improve opportunities for students to engage in public service both during and after their time at the Law School. A student-led Public Interest Working Group also worked closely with the administration on the recommendations. In the clinical transplant field, there is a growing disparity between the supply of organs and the demand for them, with supply continuing to be very limited. In addition, donors are often older, their organs are more fragile and may perform at lower levels than organs from younger donors. Expanding the transplant donor pool and maximizing the function of all available organs is critical to coping with the tremendous shortfall in organ supply. It is useful to discuss the risk factors and therapeutic modalities with all persons involved in such cases. Approximately twice as many patients with severe diseases, such as multi-organ failure and AKI, die in intensive care units when compared with patients without AKI. These patients die not as a result of AKI, but because of the different complications that follow AKI. More of controlled studies should be done to improve the clinical outcome and decrease the high costs of this therapeutic method. Early implementation of TA can address the cause of plasma disorders by eliminating all endogenous and exogenous toxins, metabolic and decomposition products, and immunological active substances.. Lysenko wo cialis bestellen sortie viagra maroc pharmacie viagra en pharmacie france sans ordonnance Ronald graduations viagra generika günstig online kaufen original viagra günstig kaufen gnome baseband biscuit generic levitra deutschland snivel shrinks viagra preis deutschland generika viagra deutschland Mahayanist pursuing viagra kaufen deutschland viagra generika kaufen deutschland Inca Bayes supper acheter viagra forum secretions unguarded achat cialis generique cialis generique france Allan ad sizzle kjøp viagra uten resept viagra reseptfritt norge electives inquire squashed acheter cialis au canada acheter cialis original
buspar Comments on: A Better Way to Cite Online Sources http://www.thinkgenealogy.com genealogy, software, ideas, and innovation Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:16:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: A Better Way to Cite Online Sources–Reprise | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-2735 A Better Way to Cite Online Sources–Reprise | ThinkGenealogy Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:14:45 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-2735 [...] 2009, I created a video that showed my dream for how citing online sources should be done (see blog post).  It would be a partnership between online record repositories and desktop genealogy [...] [...] 2009, I created a video that showed my dream for how citing online sources should be done (see blog post).  It would be a partnership between online record repositories and desktop genealogy [...]

]]>
By: Better Online Citations – Details Part 5 (MODS) | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-1145 Better Online Citations – Details Part 5 (MODS) | ThinkGenealogy Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:24:43 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-1145 [...] In this post, we continue our exploration through existing bibliographic standards to see how they might work as a format for online sites to easily share citation information.  To see the journey we have made so far, visit the page, A Better Way to Cite Online Sources. [...] [...] In this post, we continue our exploration through existing bibliographic standards to see how they might work as a format for online sites to easily share citation information.  To see the journey we have made so far, visit the page, A Better Way to Cite Online Sources. [...]

]]>
By: Better Online Citations – Details Part 3 (MARC) | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-1109 Better Online Citations – Details Part 3 (MARC) | ThinkGenealogy Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:05:48 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-1109 [...] about how to make citing online sources easier.  You can find out more about this on the page, A Better Way to Cite Online Sources.  Some of the suggestions that came from the survey and posts Details Part 1 and Details Part 2 [...] [...] about how to make citing online sources easier.  You can find out more about this on the page, A Better Way to Cite Online Sources.  Some of the suggestions that came from the survey and posts Details Part 1 and Details Part 2 [...]

]]>
By: Debbie http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-1042 Debbie Thu, 28 May 2009 13:00:52 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-1042 The video makes the common mistake of omitting to cite the website where the source was viewed. A source is what you have viewed with your own eyes. In this case Mark Tucker has seen the images on the website, not the original pages in the edition of the book held in the library at Utah. It is always important when citing any information from a website to include the exact URL of the website as well as the date when the information was accessed. This applies to Ancestry and any other online databases just as much as to any other website. This page from the Harvard referencing system provides some guidelines about using online sources: http://www.informs.intute.ac.uk/informs_perl/page.pl?action=init&render=inhale&unit=309&page=1&folio=33&id=0000006d4bb2cb77f26aac44af403225 The whole point of including a source in genealogy research is so that other people can check out your sources for themselves. What is the point of directing someone to a library in Utah when the source material is readily available online? I've sometimes been given similar obscure sources, and then subsequently discovered that there was no need to cross the Atlantic to check out an obscure book or database but that the information was readily available online on Ancestry or some other website. If you want a good example of a website which automatically provides source citations in the correct format using the URL and date then try copy and pasting material from the British History Online website: http://www.british-history.ac.uk Note that the full citation including the precise URL and date are automatically generated. This is the format which companies like Ancestry and Find My Past should be encouraged to follow. The video makes the common mistake of omitting to cite the website where the source was viewed. A source is what you have viewed with your own eyes. In this case Mark Tucker has seen the images on the website, not the original pages in the edition of the book held in the library at Utah. It is always important when citing any information from a website to include the exact URL of the website as well as the date when the information was accessed. This applies to Ancestry and any other online databases just as much as to any other website. This page from the Harvard referencing system provides some guidelines about using online sources:

http://www.informs.intute.ac.uk/informs_perl/page.pl?action=init&render=inhale&unit=309&page=1&folio=33&id=0000006d4bb2cb77f26aac44af403225

The whole point of including a source in genealogy research is so that other people can check out your sources for themselves. What is the point of directing someone to a library in Utah when the source material is readily available online? I’ve sometimes been given similar obscure sources, and then subsequently discovered that there was no need to cross the Atlantic to check out an obscure book or database but that the information was readily available online on Ancestry or some other website.

If you want a good example of a website which automatically provides source citations in the correct format using the URL and date then try copy and pasting material from the British History Online website:

http://www.british-history.ac.uk

Note that the full citation including the precise URL and date are automatically generated. This is the format which companies like Ancestry and Find My Past should be encouraged to follow.

]]>
By: Citing Sources – Online Survey « From the seed to the branches http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-987 Citing Sources – Online Survey « From the seed to the branches Fri, 15 May 2009 14:06:04 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-987 [...] Hi everyone, I just completed an online survey from Mark Tucker about citing sources. Here’s the link to it. It would really help him out alot if you would take the quick [...] [...] Hi everyone, I just completed an online survey from Mark Tucker about citing sources. Here’s the link to it. It would really help him out alot if you would take the quick [...]

]]>
By: Better Online Citations Video - Text Only | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-986 Better Online Citations Video - Text Only | ThinkGenealogy Thu, 14 May 2009 13:55:43 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-986 [...] connection. Thanks A A Bowen for reminding me of that.  Below you will find the text of the video, A Better Way to Cite Online Sources, in script form.  Before I recorded the video of the PowerPoint and demo using Camtasia Studio 6, [...] [...] connection. Thanks A A Bowen for reminding me of that.  Below you will find the text of the video, A Better Way to Cite Online Sources, in script form.  Before I recorded the video of the PowerPoint and demo using Camtasia Studio 6, [...]

]]>
By: Malcolm Young http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-981 Malcolm Young Tue, 12 May 2009 23:10:18 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-981 No video link comes up on your web page. Is your server on overload from all the response to Dick's article? No video link comes up on your web page. Is your server on overload from all the response to Dick’s article?

]]>
By: Online Source Citation: my thoughts « The Wandering Genealogist http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Online Source Citation: my thoughts « The Wandering Genealogist Fri, 08 May 2009 21:01:33 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-976 [...] spent any time recently looking at genealogy blogs you will have come across Mark Tucker’s A Better Way to Cite Online Sources video on his ThinkGenealogy blog. Mark Tucker is starting a crusade to get online providers to [...] [...] spent any time recently looking at genealogy blogs you will have come across Mark Tucker’s A Better Way to Cite Online Sources video on his ThinkGenealogy blog. Mark Tucker is starting a crusade to get online providers to [...]

]]>
By: Dick Eastman Spreads the News about Online Source Citation Video | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-964 Dick Eastman Spreads the News about Online Source Citation Video | ThinkGenealogy Thu, 07 May 2009 05:50:56 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-964 [...] would like to give Dick Eastman a big “Thank you” for blogging about the online citation video. It appeared in today’s post titled “Video Teaches Correct Citations of Online [...] [...] would like to give Dick Eastman a big “Thank you” for blogging about the online citation video. It appeared in today’s post titled “Video Teaches Correct Citations of Online [...]

]]>
By: Better Online Citations - Details Part 2 (GEDCOM) | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-954 Better Online Citations - Details Part 2 (GEDCOM) | ThinkGenealogy Sun, 03 May 2009 16:24:54 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-954 [...] programmer I lean slightly to the side of XML and that is what I used in the prototype shown in the video. But I am open to either [...] [...] programmer I lean slightly to the side of XML and that is what I used in the prototype shown in the video. But I am open to either [...]

]]>
By: Better Online Citations Video Spotlighted by Genealogy Gems | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-942 Better Online Citations Video Spotlighted by Genealogy Gems | ThinkGenealogy Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:07:46 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-942 [...] Episode 64 of the Genealogy Gems podcast, Lisa calls online downloadable source citations a “Gem of an [...] [...] Episode 64 of the Genealogy Gems podcast, Lisa calls online downloadable source citations a “Gem of an [...]

]]>
By: Better Online Citations - Details Part 1 | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-939 Better Online Citations - Details Part 1 | ThinkGenealogy Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:43:12 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-939 [...] have been a number of comments from viewers of the video, “A Better Way to Cite Online Sources”, asking about how things work behind the scenes. Being a geek by nature, I tend to be technical [...] [...] have been a number of comments from viewers of the video, “A Better Way to Cite Online Sources”, asking about how things work behind the scenes. Being a geek by nature, I tend to be technical [...]

]]>
By: Venita http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-928 Venita Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:19:43 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-928 Hi Mark, I am an experienced genealogist, and I teach genealogy at the Family History Training Center in Provo, Utah. How and why to use sources is one of my favorite soapbox issues. One of the things I am strong about is creating sources that are generic enough to be linked to several events for multiple people in the database. Each person in a genealogy database has the possibility of up to five source links just for the basic life events, ie birth, christening, marriage, death, burial. Multiply that by the number of people in the database and it is easy to see the need for being able to use a given source repeatedly wherever it is possible. Which brings me to the concern about the automatic source creation you have explained. I have some questions: Once the source is created for one event in one individual's life (as in your example), can it be linked to another event for that person or for another person? If you find further data about the same person in the same source, but it is on a different page, do you need to go through the whole process and add another set of images, etc., to your source list? What happens when you create a personal data sheet for that person which includes the sources? Will your "sheet" be one page of genealogy data and several pages of source information, some of which is duplicated? What about a family group sheet? How will it look? While I like the idea of having digital images along with the text of a source, I can see a possibility of the sources becoming redundant and overwhelming, and therefore useless to the ordinary family historian. It looks good with just the one individual in your example file. How does it look in a file of a few thousand individuals. The redundancy is one of the problems that has been revealed in other programs which have automatically created sources and added them to a database, such as PAFInsight. People don't bother to read source information unless it is simple and clear, and the pertinent data is easy to find. Our progenitors will need to know what document we looked at to find the genealogical assertion we made, and where they can find the same document to confirm that data. Everything else is bells and whistles. If there were a way to use your basic reference, "The History of Emery County," with the pertinent publication information, etc., as the source, then personalize it for each citation with the page number and perhaps the page image and quoted text, you could really be on to something! You probably have several ancestors mentioned in that book. Why create a whole new source for each mention? Just my opinion, of course. Venita Hi Mark,

I am an experienced genealogist, and I teach genealogy at the Family History Training Center in Provo, Utah. How and why to use sources is one of my favorite soapbox issues. One of the things I am strong about is creating sources that are generic enough to be linked to several events for multiple people in the database. Each person in a genealogy database has the possibility of up to five source links just for the basic life events, ie birth, christening, marriage, death, burial. Multiply that by the number of people in the database and it is easy to see the need for being able to use a given source repeatedly wherever it is possible.

Which brings me to the concern about the automatic source creation you have explained. I have some questions:

Once the source is created for one event in one individual’s life (as in your example), can it be linked to another event for that person or for another person?

If you find further data about the same person in the same source, but it is on a different page, do you need to go through the whole process and add another set of images, etc., to your source list?

What happens when you create a personal data sheet for that person which includes the sources? Will your “sheet” be one page of genealogy data and several pages of source information, some of which is duplicated?

What about a family group sheet? How will it look?

While I like the idea of having digital images along with the text of a source, I can see a possibility of the sources becoming redundant and overwhelming, and therefore useless to the ordinary family historian. It looks good with just the one individual in your example file. How does it look in a file of a few thousand individuals. The redundancy is one of the problems that has been revealed in other programs which have automatically created sources and added them to a database, such as PAFInsight. People don’t bother to read source information unless it is simple and clear, and the pertinent data is easy to find. Our progenitors will need to know what document we looked at to find the genealogical assertion we made, and where they can find the same document to confirm that data. Everything else is bells and whistles.

If there were a way to use your basic reference, “The History of Emery County,” with the pertinent publication information, etc., as the source, then personalize it for each citation with the page number and perhaps the page image and quoted text, you could really be on to something! You probably have several ancestors mentioned in that book. Why create a whole new source for each mention?

Just my opinion, of course.

Venita

]]>
By: Carole Riley http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-925 Carole Riley Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:42:45 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-925 Yes, please, I'll have one of those for TMG, and I'd seriously consider switching to any software that could provide this functionality. Yes, please, I’ll have one of those for TMG, and I’d seriously consider switching to any software that could provide this functionality.

]]>
By: Daniela Moneta http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-919 Daniela Moneta Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:21:48 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-919 Hi Mark, I live in Phoenix and have used your Genealogical Proof Standard chart; I think it is really great. I teach a family history class at ASU and am the current president of the Arizona Council for Professional Genealogists. I hope that you will consider joining our group. Annual dues are $5 a year. We have a chat group on Yahoo where we can discuss genealogy issues. Let me know if you are interested in joining us. We would like to hear about your work Daniela Hi Mark,

I live in Phoenix and have used your Genealogical Proof Standard chart; I think it is really great. I teach a family history class at ASU and am the current president of the Arizona Council for Professional Genealogists. I hope that you will consider joining our group. Annual dues are $5 a year. We have a chat group on Yahoo where we can discuss genealogy issues. Let me know if you are interested in joining us. We would like to hear about your work

Daniela

]]>
By: Mark Tucker http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-917 Mark Tucker Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:08:46 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-917 This would either use XML as the file format or an updated version of GEDCOM. You might be thinking about Zotero which is a Firefox plug-in for citation or the following link from Taneya's Genealogy blog: http://www.taneya-kalonji.com/genblog/?p=705 There are a number of tools to do citation including EndNote and RefWorks but to my knowledge none support templates from Evidence Explained. Many websites like WorldCat.org support source citation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8W7kWMrVNk In fact, I see citing sources as an important feature of the soon-to-be-released GenSeek catalog. Keep thinking! Mark This would either use XML as the file format or an updated version of GEDCOM.

You might be thinking about Zotero which is a Firefox plug-in for citation or the following link from Taneya’s Genealogy blog: http://www.taneya-kalonji.com/genblog/?p=705

There are a number of tools to do citation including EndNote and RefWorks but to my knowledge none support templates from Evidence Explained.

Many websites like WorldCat.org support source citation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8W7kWMrVNk

In fact, I see citing sources as an important feature of the soon-to-be-released GenSeek catalog.

Keep thinking!

Mark

]]>
By: Denise Olson http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-916 Denise Olson Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:47:30 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-916 I'm curious, does this system use XML? I vaguely remember seeing something recently about an XML standard for citations in the book world and was wondering if this is in any way similar. I’m curious, does this system use XML? I vaguely remember seeing something recently about an XML standard for citations in the book world and was wondering if this is in any way similar.

]]>
By: Video: Better Way to Cite Online Sources | ThinkGenealogy http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-914 Video: Better Way to Cite Online Sources | ThinkGenealogy Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:11:49 +0000 http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?page_id=536#comment-914 [...] http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/ [...] [...] http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/better-online-citations/ [...]

]]>