<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Better Way to Cite Online Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/</link>
	<description>genealogy, software, ideas, and innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Source Citation Tips and Taps &#171; Reclaiming Kin</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>Source Citation Tips and Taps &#171; Reclaiming Kin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t point you to Mark Tucker&#8217;s excellent video post on &#8220;A Better Way to Cite Online Sources&#8221; over at ThinkGenealogy. Check it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t point you to Mark Tucker&#8217;s excellent video post on &#8220;A Better Way to Cite Online Sources&#8221; over at ThinkGenealogy. Check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Online Citations Surveys Now Closed &#124; ThinkGenealogy</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Online Citations Surveys Now Closed &#124; ThinkGenealogy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>[...] 50 days ago, I posted a video titled &#8220;A Better Way to Cite Onilne Sources&#8221; with 2 corresponding surveys. Since then 358 people responded to the individual survey and 9 to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 50 days ago, I posted a video titled &#8220;A Better Way to Cite Onilne Sources&#8221; with 2 corresponding surveys. Since then 358 people responded to the individual survey and 9 to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen J. Danko</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Danko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Well, Mark, you&#039;ve certainly inspired some &quot;water cooler&quot; conversation with this video!  Thanks for your initiative to get us to think about this.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mark, you&#8217;ve certainly inspired some &#8220;water cooler&#8221; conversation with this video!  Thanks for your initiative to get us to think about this.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Pennola</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Pennola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-937</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark:

Great Idea !  Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but doesn&#039;t Ancestry.com already provide source citations when you merge a record into your database?  

Keep up the great THINK !

Regards,

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark:</p>
<p>Great Idea !  Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but doesn&#8217;t Ancestry.com already provide source citations when you merge a record into your database?  </p>
<p>Keep up the great THINK !</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Louise Cooke</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Louise Cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, Thanks for opening up this conversation.  The video is terrific for those of us &quot;visual types!&quot;   I invite your readers to listen to my online radio show Genealogy Gems Podcast Episode 64 at http://www.genealogygemspodcast.com/index.php?post_id=463012
(also available in iTunes). In this episode I give my take on the subject.  In addition, I asked both Ancestry and World Vital Records for interviews to give their thoughts on the subject and I play those in the episode as well.  It&#039;s a great chance to hear where the big subscription records companies stand on this important issue.

As always you&#039;ve got us thinking and hopefully all talking about how improvements can be made.   Thanks Mark!   Best, Lisa Louise Cooke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, Thanks for opening up this conversation.  The video is terrific for those of us &#8220;visual types!&#8221;   I invite your readers to listen to my online radio show Genealogy Gems Podcast Episode 64 at <a href="http://www.genealogygemspodcast.com/index.php?post_id=463012" rel="nofollow">http://www.genealogygemspodcast.com/index.php?post_id=463012</a><br />
(also available in iTunes). In this episode I give my take on the subject.  In addition, I asked both Ancestry and World Vital Records for interviews to give their thoughts on the subject and I play those in the episode as well.  It&#8217;s a great chance to hear where the big subscription records companies stand on this important issue.</p>
<p>As always you&#8217;ve got us thinking and hopefully all talking about how improvements can be made.   Thanks Mark!   Best, Lisa Louise Cooke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-922</guid>
		<description>I use Zotero and have looked at what it would take to have it support EE-style templates.  Currently it does not support the many record types that genealogists use as well as being limited in the number of fields (author, place, publisher, etc.) offered.

It is my hope that this effort could include companies and organizations that already have citation software.  This would include zotero, EndNote, RefWorks, and EasyBib.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Zotero and have looked at what it would take to have it support EE-style templates.  Currently it does not support the many record types that genealogists use as well as being limited in the number of fields (author, place, publisher, etc.) offered.</p>
<p>It is my hope that this effort could include companies and organizations that already have citation software.  This would include zotero, EndNote, RefWorks, and EasyBib.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bashford</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2009/04/20/video-better-way-to-cite-online-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bashford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/?p=539#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Mark 

Nice article ... I suggest that you look at the zotero.org citation browser addon ... they&#039;ve already done the heavy lifting ... some further work would be required by geneealogy websites and software providers, but htis might be a promising direction.

Regards

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark </p>
<p>Nice article &#8230; I suggest that you look at the zotero.org citation browser addon &#8230; they&#8217;ve already done the heavy lifting &#8230; some further work would be required by geneealogy websites and software providers, but htis might be a promising direction.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
