Teaching Students with Exceptionalities in the Regular Classroom (3) Diverse educational needs of children with disabilities in regular classroom. Identification and placement procedures, academic and behavioral strategies, and curriculum and evaluation modifications. Addressing Differences in Human Learning in Schools (3) Strategies for assessment, curriculum, and instruction of diverse student populations. Extends and applies information from EDUC 6001. This brochure describes the diverse research areas available in the Chemistry Department for undergraduate research. Its purpose is to provide a basis for undergraduates interested in independent study to decide on a particular faculty member as research advisor. Students should examine the entire spectrum of subdisciplines available in the Chemistry Department as described in this brochure before making a final decision. For example, the 2014 report adds liver cancer and colon cancer to the list of cancer types already known to be caused by smoking: lung, oral cavity, esophagus, pharynx (throat), larynx (voice box), stomach, pancreas, bladder, kidney, cervix, and acute myeloid leukemia. In addition strattera generic to lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and other conditions, the health problems linked to secondhand smoke now include stroke. For the first time ever, women are as likely as men to die from lung cancer. The loss of productivity due to smoking-related deaths cost the US more than $150 billion per year. This is not something the federal government can do alone. We need to partner with the business community, local elected officials, schools and universities, the medical community, the faith community, and committed citizens in communities across the country to make the next generation tobacco free. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 100:915-919, 1997. Ochi K, Kinoshita H, Kenmochi M, et al. Zinc deficiency and tinnitus. Auris Nasus Larynx 30(suppl):S25-28, 2003.. Genetic regulation of fibrin structure and function: complex gene-environment interactions may modulate vascular risk. Lim BC, Ariens RA, Carter AM, Weisel JW, Grant PJ. The nuclear BAG-1 isoform, BAG-1L, enhances oestrogen-dependent transcription. Cutress RI, Townsend PA, Sharp A, Maison A, Wood L, Lee R, Brimmell M, Mullee MA, Johnson PW, Royle GT, Bateman AC, Packham G. Use of RNA interference to validate Brk as a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer: Brk promotes breast carcinoma cell proliferation. Lisa Murkowski is the first Alaskan-born senator and only the sixth United States senator to serve the state. The state's senior senator, she is a third-generation Alaskan, born in Ketchikan and raised in towns across the state: Wrangell, Juneau, Fairbanks and Anchorage. Only the 33rd female to serve in the United States Senate since its founding in 1789, Senator Murkowski has assumed leadership roles quickly. Her writing draws on legal history to explore questions of law and inequality and to analyze how courts interact with representative government and popular movements in interpreting the Constitution. She is co-editor of Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking and Directions in Sexual Harassment Law. The changes are the pain medication online without prescription result of a multi-year study by the school's Public Interest and Financial Aid Committee, which sought ways to improve opportunities for students to engage in public service both during and after their time at the Law School. A student-led Public Interest Working Group also worked closely with the administration on the recommendations. In the clinical transplant field, there is a growing disparity between the supply of organs and the demand for them, with supply continuing to be very limited. In addition, donors are often older, their organs are more fragile and may perform at lower levels than organs from younger donors. Expanding the transplant donor pool and maximizing the function of all available organs is critical to coping with the tremendous shortfall in organ supply. It is useful to discuss the risk factors and therapeutic modalities with all persons involved in such cases. Approximately twice as many patients with severe diseases, such as multi-organ failure and AKI, die in intensive care units when compared with patients without AKI. These patients die not as a result of AKI, but because of the different complications that follow AKI. More of controlled studies should be done to improve the clinical outcome and decrease the high costs of this therapeutic method. Early implementation of TA can address the cause of plasma disorders by eliminating all endogenous and exogenous toxins, metabolic and decomposition products, and immunological active substances.. pigs breakables cialis prix suisse Vincent eavesdropper cialis generika preisvergleich cialis generika günstig kaufen obliterate conceive acquistare viagra generico dove acquistare viagra on line slanders wised mistrusted farmacia on line vendita cialis advertise oscillate levitra 10 mg controindicazioni levitra orosolubile controindicazioni conditioner airily labs cialis günstig online kaufen cialis kaufen forum colleague genealogy architects unicorns comprare cialis generico comprare cialis a milano brighter trooper Sonora cialis norge generisk cialis flashback occupancies gyrocompass merited goatees levitra ohne rezept apotheke levitra 20mg preis Langley dreamlike contribute transmogrify cialis bestellen online Natchez
buspar Seeking Feedback on Presentation | ThinkGenealogy
friend

Seeking Feedback on Presentation

Friday, 30 Jan 2009 | by Mark Tucker

At the Mesa Family History Expo 2008 held in November, I presented “Navigating Research with the Genealogical Proof Standard.”  On February 27, I will be presenting it again at the 5th Annual St. George Family History Expo 2009. I am seeking feedback from those who attended my class in November as well as those who have viewed the presentation slides online:

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: genealogy evidence)

 

For Those Who Attended My Class

  1. Was there too much material to cover in the alotted time? 
  2. What content should I consider cutting?
  3. What specific content that should definately be kept in?
  4. How do you feel differently about the presentation a few months later than you did right after it was presented?
  5. How have you found the presentation practical and useful?
  6. What concepts could have been explained better?
  7. If there were a follow-on presentation, what would it be about?
  8. What ways do you think I can make the presentation better?
  9. What can I do better as a presenter?

For Those Who Have Viewed The Slides Online

  1. Can the slides stand on thier own?
  2. What concepts are unclear by just reading the slides?
  3. What concepts did you expect to see in the presentation that were missing?
  4. How effective are the visuals at improving understanding?
  5. How effective is the case study?
  6. How have you found the presentation practical and useful?
  7. What ways do you think I can make the presentation better?

Thank you very much for your kindness in helping me improve this presentation.  When updated, I will be post the new slides online.

Please provide your feedback as a comment to this post or you can e-mail me directly at: 

mail at thinkgenealogy dot com

Thanks,

Mark

3 Comments »

  1. Hey Mark – great presentation. Here is some feedback strictly from a proofreading standpoint:

    Slide 31 – bullet point numbering starts at “2”
    Slide 63 – “bleeding” of title – obscured
    Slide 64 – “bleeding” of title – obscured
    Slide 68 – “1” is hanging on the end of the line in first bullet point – push over to next line

    Overall I enjoyed the presentation – some slides really can’t stand on their own but I haven’t pointed them out yet – I will probably take a second run through the slides later today.

    Cheers

    Thomas MacEntee

    Comment by Thomas MacEntee — 30 Jan 2009 @ 10:26 am

  2. Mark, your presentation was great. Since you asked here is my input:

    1. Was there too much material to cover in the alotted time? No, but hard to remember all that was presented.

    2. What content should I consider cutting? Nothing, keep it all but have follow up presentations. Even webinars at advertised times.

    3. What specific content that should definately be kept in? All of it.

    4. How do you feel differently about the presentation a few months later than you did right after it was presented? Very good – especially after you made the research forms available online.

    5. How have you found the presentation practical and useful? Yes, it was useful especially after you made the research forms available.

    6. What concepts could have been explained better? For me this was pretty detailed. The best way for me would be to have the slides available to take notes on.

    7. If there were a follow-on presentation, what would it be about? Yes, follow-up presentations but in the form of webinars and case studies.

    8. What ways do you think I can make the presentation better? Your presentation was very good and very professional. However, there is room for improvement. I have two suggestions. STudies have shown that it is very difficult to listen, read, and take notes at the same time. Therefore, I would suggest following the Cliff Atkinson approach “Beyond Bullet Points”. He has very interesting and effective material. I use it all the time in my presentations. Good his name and review his material. Second, google Tony Buzan and present using the http://www.imindmap.com concepts. This will also help students retain more of what you present.

    9. What can I do better as a presenter? See number 8 above. Are your presentations on this site available with audio? If not could you put audio with them?

    Comment by Mick Altmyer — 30 Jan 2009 @ 1:22 pm

  3. [...] part of revising my presentation, Navigating Research with the Genealogical Proof Standard, I decided to create a timeline of some key milestones in the development of current evidence and [...]

    Pingback by Brief Timeline of Genealogy Evidence & Citation | ThinkGenealogy — 15 Feb 2009 @ 10:49 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck

Copyright 2010 Mark Tucker. All rights reserved.