<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if Genealogy had a TED Conference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/</link>
	<description>genealogy, software, ideas, and innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denise Levenick</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Levenick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Michael, for the very helpful description of &quot;cluster genealogy.&quot; As a writer/researcher, I find the family connections and stories the most interesting part of genealogy and your ideas to track a &quot;historical social community&quot; strike me as a very useful tool. That said, yes, it is quite difficult to construct a set &quot;form&quot; to use as a log for these relationships. 

What about some tool that also uses a narrative?  I have been considering the idea of a family Who&#039;s Who, brief prose biographies that would present information in an engaging narrative with sources listed outside the narrative itself. By this I do not mean the prose statement of facts, dates, and places that is generated by genealogy software, but something highly personal and engaging. This would be enhanced by a form that offers the sources and raw data, but the narrative would allow for the human connections to be revealed...  A marries B with C as a witness; the narrative could explain that C is the foster child raised by the family of B.

I will be checking your website, and enjoy this conversation. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Michael, for the very helpful description of &#8220;cluster genealogy.&#8221; As a writer/researcher, I find the family connections and stories the most interesting part of genealogy and your ideas to track a &#8220;historical social community&#8221; strike me as a very useful tool. That said, yes, it is quite difficult to construct a set &#8220;form&#8221; to use as a log for these relationships. </p>
<p>What about some tool that also uses a narrative?  I have been considering the idea of a family Who&#8217;s Who, brief prose biographies that would present information in an engaging narrative with sources listed outside the narrative itself. By this I do not mean the prose statement of facts, dates, and places that is generated by genealogy software, but something highly personal and engaging. This would be enhanced by a form that offers the sources and raw data, but the narrative would allow for the human connections to be revealed&#8230;  A marries B with C as a witness; the narrative could explain that C is the foster child raised by the family of B.</p>
<p>I will be checking your website, and enjoy this conversation. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hait</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>I have not quite formalized the system yet, though when I do, I will likely publish the results:  on my website, in a magazine/journal, and/or in manuscript form.  I am particularly interested in two aspects:  the graphical form of note-taking as espoused in Tony Buzan&#039;s &quot;Mind Map&quot; concept, and many of the new discoveries/insights of network theory.

At this point, my idea of a social web involves a combination of the Pedigree Chart and Family Group Record, similar to an &quot;All-in-One Chart&quot;, with additional connections added for non-familial relations.  For example, spouses&#039; siblings and siblings&#039; spouses, neighbors, additional parties to deeds, witnesses to baptisms and wills, and others who attended the same church, or shared a similar occupation in the same town, etc.  &quot;Cluster genealogy&quot; attempts to reconstruct the social structure surrounding a given individual at a given time and place -- one of the concepts of network theory states that if A knows B, and B knows C, then A is highly likely to at some point know C.  In mapping social relationships, one often finds that such social circles indeed exist, with a small group of people often being involved with each other throughout a given period of time in multiple facets.

Social circles are best expressed in a very loosely structured format.  This makes it quite difficult to create a set &quot;form&quot; (like those in the Toolkit).  I have had some success in using the WordArt functions of Microsoft Word, and MS Power Point also works well to a degree.

Aside from this project, however, I have indeed been thinking of additional ideas for new forms, and plan to have a few &quot;web-exclusive&quot; forms available on my website soon.  Check back often for their availability:  http://haitfamilyresearch.com/toolkit.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not quite formalized the system yet, though when I do, I will likely publish the results:  on my website, in a magazine/journal, and/or in manuscript form.  I am particularly interested in two aspects:  the graphical form of note-taking as espoused in Tony Buzan&#8217;s &#8220;Mind Map&#8221; concept, and many of the new discoveries/insights of network theory.</p>
<p>At this point, my idea of a social web involves a combination of the Pedigree Chart and Family Group Record, similar to an &#8220;All-in-One Chart&#8221;, with additional connections added for non-familial relations.  For example, spouses&#8217; siblings and siblings&#8217; spouses, neighbors, additional parties to deeds, witnesses to baptisms and wills, and others who attended the same church, or shared a similar occupation in the same town, etc.  &#8220;Cluster genealogy&#8221; attempts to reconstruct the social structure surrounding a given individual at a given time and place &#8212; one of the concepts of network theory states that if A knows B, and B knows C, then A is highly likely to at some point know C.  In mapping social relationships, one often finds that such social circles indeed exist, with a small group of people often being involved with each other throughout a given period of time in multiple facets.</p>
<p>Social circles are best expressed in a very loosely structured format.  This makes it quite difficult to create a set &#8220;form&#8221; (like those in the Toolkit).  I have had some success in using the WordArt functions of Microsoft Word, and MS Power Point also works well to a degree.</p>
<p>Aside from this project, however, I have indeed been thinking of additional ideas for new forms, and plan to have a few &#8220;web-exclusive&#8221; forms available on my website soon.  Check back often for their availability:  <a href="http://haitfamilyresearch.com/toolkit.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://haitfamilyresearch.com/toolkit.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Levenick</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Levenick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/#comment-406</guid>
		<description>I am glad to see that Michael Hait is still thinking of new research forms -- I use the toolkit to help organize my notes when I have a particular family focus. As I encourage students in my high school classes, I find that the exercise of typing notes or even recopying is a solid learning tool. Michael&#039;s ideas of a &quot;social web/map&quot; and &quot;cluster genealogy&quot; are intriguing. Where can I find out more about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to see that Michael Hait is still thinking of new research forms &#8212; I use the toolkit to help organize my notes when I have a particular family focus. As I encourage students in my high school classes, I find that the exercise of typing notes or even recopying is a solid learning tool. Michael&#8217;s ideas of a &#8220;social web/map&#8221; and &#8220;cluster genealogy&#8221; are intriguing. Where can I find out more about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hait</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I would like to express support for, and add to, the comment above by Denise - As the author of THE FAMILY HISTORY RESEARCH TOOLKIT (Genealogical, 2008), I am obviously very interested in bringing the classic genealogy forms into the 21st century and beyond.  While the Toolkit has fillable/savable PDF forms (perfect for sharing information with non-users of genealogy software), I still believe that additional improvements could be made to the forms that are used.  Family Group Records and Pedigree Charts have been around forever!  One idea that I am toying around with right now is a &quot;social web/social map&quot; idea, taking advantage of the benefits of so-called &quot;cluster genealogy&quot;.  I am also drawing inspiration from the &quot;genogram&quot; format of graphic representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to express support for, and add to, the comment above by Denise &#8211; As the author of THE FAMILY HISTORY RESEARCH TOOLKIT (Genealogical, 2008), I am obviously very interested in bringing the classic genealogy forms into the 21st century and beyond.  While the Toolkit has fillable/savable PDF forms (perfect for sharing information with non-users of genealogy software), I still believe that additional improvements could be made to the forms that are used.  Family Group Records and Pedigree Charts have been around forever!  One idea that I am toying around with right now is a &#8220;social web/social map&#8221; idea, taking advantage of the benefits of so-called &#8220;cluster genealogy&#8221;.  I am also drawing inspiration from the &#8220;genogram&#8221; format of graphic representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Levenick</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Levenick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkgenealogy.com/2008/05/21/what-if-genealogy-had-a-ted-conference/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Mark, I would like to see a topic on designing genealogy forms for computer users. As a relative newcomer (10 yrs) to genealogy and fairly tech-savvy it surprises me that more computer-friendly forms are not available for the user. Most books still have printouts to photocopy, but how many people use these. I had to search extensively for .doc forms that I could fill in through MS Word and was very happy to find a set of PDF forms and charts from Michael Hait to use.

I would like to use charts and forms that take advantage of color, fonts, styles -- all things that you use admirably in you Geneaology Research Map. I even tried to make a custom research form following the map and using the colors and symbols you set out. . .  alas, my charting skills are not up to the task (yet!).  Good design does help with good research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I would like to see a topic on designing genealogy forms for computer users. As a relative newcomer (10 yrs) to genealogy and fairly tech-savvy it surprises me that more computer-friendly forms are not available for the user. Most books still have printouts to photocopy, but how many people use these. I had to search extensively for .doc forms that I could fill in through MS Word and was very happy to find a set of PDF forms and charts from Michael Hait to use.</p>
<p>I would like to use charts and forms that take advantage of color, fonts, styles &#8212; all things that you use admirably in you Geneaology Research Map. I even tried to make a custom research form following the map and using the colors and symbols you set out. . .  alas, my charting skills are not up to the task (yet!).  Good design does help with good research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
